School Board Gives Away the Farm

August 29, 2011

On a 6-3 vote earlier today, the DeKalb County Board of Education voted to hire Dr. Cheryl Atkinson to be the new superintendent of schools. Board members Nancy Jester, Pam Speaks, and Don McChesney voted against the choice. All others voted in favor.

Thank you to everyone who took the time to call or e-mail the school board members about the proposed contract for Dr. Atkinson. Click here and here to read my previous messages on the subject.

I hope Dr. Atkinson turns out to be a good superintendent. However, the contract that is bringing her to DeKalb County reveals that our school board has learned nothing from its colossal failures with two recent superintendents, Crawford Lewis (who was indicted) and Johnny Brown (who was dismissed).

As I showed you in one of my previous messages, Dr. Atkinson’s contract contains the following “termination for convenience” clause requiring a vote by three-fourths (3/4) supermajority of the school board in order to terminate her if her performance is sub-par:

“The BOARD, upon a three-fourths (3/4) vote of its members, may at its option unilaterally terminate this Contract for its convenience by giving the SUPERINTENDENT a minimum of ninety (90) days written notice of termination at any time. In the event of such termination, the BOARD shall pay to the SUPERINTENDENT severance pay, either all of the aggregate salary she would have earned under this Contract from the actual date of termination to the termination date set forth in this Contract, or a sum equivalent to twelve (12) months of the annual base salary as stated in Paragraph 4 of this Contract, whichever is less.”

In responding to citizen concerns about this clause, a couple of school board members chose to hide behind a subsequent clause of the contract, the “termination for cause” provision, which reads:

“Termination for cause shall constitute conduct which is seriously prejudicial to the District, including but not limited to, neglect of duty, or breach of contract. Notice of termination for cause shall be given in writing and the SUPERINTENDENT shall be entitled to appear before the BOARD to discuss such causes. If the SUPERINTENDENT chooses to be accompanied by legal counsel at such meeting, if allowed in closed, executive session under applicable law, she shall bear any costs therein involved. Such meeting shall be conducted in closed, executive session unless specifically prohibited by State law. The SUPERINTENDENT shall be provided a written decision describing the results of the meeting.”

The concept of termination for cause is a breeding ground for litigation. It is unclear what, short of a criminal indictment, would constitute a sufficient basis for invoking this provision.

The provision that is most likely to be invoked is the termination for convenience clause, the one with the three-fourths restriction. It is odd for a government entity to contract away its right to take an action by simple majority vote. I’m not 100% convinced that the three-fourths restriction would pass legal muster if challenged in court.

Dr. Atkinson’s contract already includes high compensation, abundant fringe benefits, and an overly generous “golden parachute” if the termination for convenience clause is invoked. If you couple the generosity of these provisions with a three-fourths barrier to termination, the school board has gone too far.

In 2012, the DeKalb school board will shrink from nine to seven members. Right now, all it will take is three of nine board members to keep a lackluster superintendent in place. After the board membership is reduced to seven, just two members can prevent our school system from moving forward.

It’s easy to see how a superintendent and very small minority of school board members could abuse the three-fourths provision. Let’s hope it never comes to that, but the fact that the contract allows this to happen is an unfortunate byproduct of the decisions that have brought Dr. Atkinson to DeKalb.


Ashford Dunwoody Consensus Reached

August 29, 2011

I want to extend my gratitude to the Ashford Alliance Community Association for hosting a meeting last week about the possibility of $5 million in improvements to Ashford Dunwoody Road, and to the many citizens who attended this meeting.

The consensus of the attendees was that the funding should be pursued and the project should focus on improving the intersection of Ashford Dunwoody and Johnson Ferry Roads, synchronizing traffic signals where possible, and improving the sidewalks along the entire corridor from I-285 at the north to Peachtree Road at the south.

There remains opposition to the concept of imposing the regional T-SPLOST sales tax in the first place. I acknowledge this opposition, but note that we are only talking about the T-SPLOST project list at this point. You’ll get to cast a vote on the sales tax at the ballot box in July 2012. Ultimately, whether or not there is a T-SPLOST is in your hands.

Ted Rhinehart, DeKalb County’s Deputy COO for Infrastructure, will be developing a scope for the potential Ashford Dunwoody project. If you have any further thoughts, you can e-mail them to David Pelton, who works with Mr. Rhinehart, at dwpelton@dekalbcountyga.gov.


Call to Action on Superintendent Contract

August 25, 2011

Something has come to my attention that requires immediate citizen action. In the message (click for link) that I sent earlier this week, I told you about the DeKalb County School System’s choice of Dr. Cheryl Atkinson to be the new superintendent of schools.

Embedded in the proposed contract between Dr. Atkinson and the school system is the following, very troubling termination clause:

“The BOARD, upon a three-fourths (3/4) vote of its members, may at its option unilaterally terminate this Contract for its convenience by giving the SUPERINTENDENT a minimum of ninety (90) days written notice of termination at any time. In the event of such termination, the BOARD shall pay to the SUPERINTENDENT severance pay, either all of the aggregate salary she would have earned under this Contract from the actual date of termination to the termination date set forth in this Contract, or a sum equivalent to twelve (12) months of the annual base salary as stated in Paragraph 4 of this Contract, whichever is less.”

You read that correctly. The DeKalb County Board of Education proposes to require a three-fourths (3/4) supermajority of its members to terminate the new superintendent’s contract.

That makes it difficult to fire a superintendent whose performance is lackluster. The contract should provide for termination upon a simple majority vote. Our school board is failing us on this one.

The school board has a poor track record of picking superintendents. Our most recent superintendent, Crawford Lewis, was indicted. The superintendent before him, Johnny Brown, was a failure and released from the position. Why on earth would our school board want to make it more difficult to dismiss a superintendent who is failing our children?

The three-fourths termination clause, standing alone, is terrible. When viewed in context with DeKalb’s history of hiring bad superintendents, it’s unconscionable. And if Dr. Atkinson won’t come to DeKalb without the three-fourths clause in her contract, we don’t need her.

Please take a minute to call or e-mail the members of the board of education and ask them to rewrite the termination clause to allow the superintendent to be released by simple majority vote of the school board. Here is their contact information:

Tom Bowen, Chairman
(404) 392-1621
thomas_bowen@fc.dekalb.k12.ga.us

Paul Womack, Vice Chairman
(404) 680-8790
h_paul_womack@fc.dekalb.k12.ga.us

Sarah Copelin-Wood
(404) 371-1490
sarah_copelin-wood@fc.dekalb.k12.ga.us

Jay Cunningham
(404) 392-3091
jay_cunningham@fc.dekalb.k12.ga.us

Donna Edler
(404) 394-1238
donna_edler@fc.dekalb.k12.ga.us

Nancy Jester
(404) 394-8750
nancy_jester@fc.dekalb.k12.ga.us

Don McChesney
(404) 664-2458
don_mcchesney@fc.dekalb.k12.ga.us

Pam Speaks
(404) 931-7971
pam_speaks@fc.dekalb.k12.ga.us

Eugene Walker
(404) 593-5095
eugene_p_walker@fc.dekalb.k12.ga.us

I am told that some of the school board members would prefer that the contract provision be eliminated, but a majority of the school board is intent on proceeding with the contract as written. You can read the full contract by clicking here.

Please consider forwarding this message to your neighbors and urging them to take action.


Ashford Dunwoody Funding Makes the Cut

August 23, 2011

On August 15, the executive committee of the Metro Atlanta transportation roundtable completed its work approving a $6.14 billion list of regional transportation projects for the one-cent sales tax referendum that will be held in 2012.

Pursuant to the Transportation Investment Act, the state law that created the transportation roundtable and referendum, I have been serving as one of three non-voting state legislators (two representatives and one senator) on the roundtable. The roundtable includes the head of the county government (from DeKalb County, CEO Burrell Ellis) and one mayor (from DeKalb, Mayor Bill Floyd of Decatur) from each county throughout the Metro Atlanta region.

You can view the full $6.14 billion list by clicking here. It remains subject to change because the full roundtable must now weigh-in on the list. The executive committee that approved the list is a subset of the membership of the full roundtable.

Ultimately, the fate of this list is in your hands. You’ll get to decide with your vote in 2012.

The list includes $5 million for operational improvements to Ashford Dunwoody Road, from I-285 at the north to Peachtree Road at the south. Like the vast majority of projects that were proposed for the Transportation Investment Act, the Ashford Dunwoody project does not have any specific plan or scope at this time. However, it’s safe to say that the objectives are to improve traffic flow, walkability, and pedestrian safety, and that the project will not involve four-laning Ashford Dunwoody Road.

A few weeks ago, I conducted an unbiased telephone survey about the Ashford Dunwoody project using a survey question that included all of the possible features and consequences of the project. The question was over-inclusive and probably reflects more than will actually happen.

The question and results are below. The results of this phone survey are similar in terms of pro and con sentiments to the 200+ e-mail responses that I received after sending out this e-mail (click for link).

658 registered voters in the Montgomery Elementary, Ashford Parkside, and Ashford Dunwoody precincts, the three voting precincts through which this stretch of Ashford Dunwoody runs, responded to the following script:

“This is a telephone survey for registered voters who live near Ashford Dunwoody Road inside 285.

There could be funding available for a project to improve Ashford Dunwoody Road. Please listen carefully to what the project would involve, and I will ask you at the end of this phone call whether or not you would support it.

The Ashford Dunwoody project would add sidewalks and possibly bike lanes on both sides of Ashford Dunwoody from 285 at the northern end to Peachtree Road at the southern end. The project will include a significant amount of new turn lanes, including center turn lanes to allow traffic to pass cars that are waiting to turn left. It also would involve a reconfiguration of the intersection of Ashford Dunwoody and Johnson Ferry Roads. In order to make these changes, the project would encroach on properties that front Ashford Dunwoody Road, including the residential properties near Montgomery Elementary School. The project would not involve four-laning Ashford Dunwoody Road.

Keeping in mind everything that I just told you, would you support or oppose these changes to Ashford Dunwoody Road?”

The results:

56% Support (366 respondents)
30% Oppose (199 respondents)
14% Undecided (92 respondents)


What ADR Improvements Do You Support?

August 23, 2011

On a related note, the Ashford Alliance Community Association is holding a meeting to discuss what improvements you would like to see on Ashford Dunwoody Road. I will be participating in this meeting along with Ted Rhinehart, DeKalb County’s Deputy COO for Infrastructure.

The meeting will be Wednesday, August 24, at 7:00 p.m. at the Ashford Parkside Senior Residences, on the right-hand side of Donaldson Drive heading north from Johnson Ferry Road.


Let’s Hope “Super” Pick Isn’t Mediocre

August 23, 2011

The DeKalb County School System has announced its choice to be the new superintendent of schools: Dr. Cheryl Atkinson, the current superintendent of the Lorain, Ohio city schools.

This choice is cause for concern. The school system in Lorain, Ohio has approximately 8,000 students. DeKalb County has approximately 98,000 students. Plus, Dr. Atkinson lacks a clear track record of improving student achievement in her present school district.

The board of education had other choices and attempted to negotiate with two candidates hailing from larger school systems. Details of those talks were leaked by someone with inside knowledge of the process in an effort to scuttle the negotiations.

Unfortunately, this tactic succeeded.

Senator Fran Millar (R-Dunwoody), Rep. Mary Margaret Oliver (D-Decatur), and I — among others — lent our support to Brad Bryant, a former member of the DeKalb County Board of Education and State Board of Education and former State Superintendent of Schools, whom we hoped would be named to the post on an interim basis. This would have been similar to the stabilizing role that Erroll Davis, the former Chancellor of the University System of Georgia, is currently playing as the interim superintendent for the Atlanta Public Schools.

This suggestion was ignored.

Dr. Atkinson likely will arrive in DeKalb following a non-unanimous vote of the school board. Board members Nancy Jester and Don McChesney already have announced that they disagree with the choice. Click here to read what they had to say.

I encourage you to review the facts and, if you agree with Nancy Jester and Don McChesney, contact the other school board members. This is a crucial decision for a school system that is standing at a crossroads with its SACS accreditation on the line. Click here for contact details for the school board.

For further information, please click here for a blog post about an upcoming opportunity to meet Dr. Atkinson this Saturday, August 27, and for details about her proposed contract.


How To Appeal Your Property Assessment

July 6, 2011

The deadline to appeal your property assessment is Monday, July 11. Here is an informative video on how to file an appeal. If you found this video helpful, please tell your neighbors. They might find it helpful, too.


Your Thoughts About Ashford Dunwoody Road

July 6, 2011

The Metro Atlanta transportation roundtable is in the process of winnowing down the list of transportation projects that will be proposed to be funded with a penny sales tax if you support it in a referendum that will occur next year. The purpose of this message is not to discuss the merits of the transportation sales tax. You’ll get to decide its fate with your vote in 2012. Instead, this message is aimed at discussing a particular project affecting our community.

This roundtable is comprised of the head of the county government (from DeKalb, CEO Burrell Ellis) and one mayor (from DeKalb, Mayor Bill Floyd of Decatur) from each county throughout the Metro Atlanta region. The roundtable also includes one state senator appointed by the chairman of the Senate Transportation Committee and two state representatives appointed by the chairman of the House Transportation Committee, who serve in an ex officio capacity. The two state representatives are me and Sean Jerguson of Cherokee County.

Each county and city in the region was asked to submit a transportation “wish list” to the state transportation planning director, Todd Long. Mr. Long then cut the list down to a more manageable size. Click here to view an interactive map of the projects that made the cut.

Improvements to Ashford Dunwoody Road from I-285 at the north to Peachtree Road at the south were part of DeKalb County’s initial submission to Mr. Long. The proposed upgrades to Ashford Dunwoody do not include four-laning the road. Rather, we are talking about adding and lengthening turn lanes, installing sidewalks and bike paths on both sides of the road, and implementing congestion mitigation and pedestrian upgrades (i.e., useable crosswalks) at the intersection of Ashford Dunwoody and Johnson Ferry Roads.

I was surprised to find out that DeKalb County, after initially submitting the project for consideration, asked Mr. Long to take the improvements to Ashford Dunwoody Road off the list. They were replaced with a minor sidewalk project on Ashford Dunwoody from Windsor Parkway to Peachtree. DeKalb’s stated reason for this removal was “neighborhood opposition.” Mr. Long did initially take the Ashford Dunwoody improvements off the list, but has restored them at my request.

My question to you is this: Is there really neighborhood opposition to adding turn lanes and new sidewalks and bike paths on Ashford Dunwoody Road, and to improving the intersection of Ashford Dunwoody and Johnson Ferry?

This message will reach more citizens in the affected neighborhoods than any other method of communication, so I want to hear from you. Please forward this message to your neighbors and reply back to me at repjacobs@comcast.net. If the response is positive, I am willing to go to the mat to ensure that the Ashford Dunwoody project makes the final project list for next year’s vote.

Personally, I think the project will make our community more livable and walkable and help to alleviate the perennial bottlenecks of traffic to and from Perimeter Center, pill hill (the medical centers), and Peachtree Road. It would do more to alleviate congestion and improve the quality of life for citizens than many other “wish list” projects submitted by DeKalb County.

Ultimately, however, it’s not my call. It’s yours. Congestion relief and pedestrian upgrades on Ashford Dunwoody: thumbs up or thumbs down? I’d like to hear from you on this important community issue.


Informational Meeting on City of Brookhaven

May 23, 2011

Please join me for an informational meeting on the proposal for a City of Brookhaven on Tuesday, May 24, at 7:00 p.m. in Lupton Auditorium in the main building of Oglethorpe University, 4484 Peachtree Road.

The Carl Vinson Institute of Government at the University of Georgia will be tasked with performing a feasibility study as to how a City of Brookhaven might impact your local services (either positively or negatively) and your taxes (again, either positively or negatively).

Tuesday’s meeting will include Ted Baggett of the Carl Vinson Institute to answer your questions about what will go into the feasibility study and what we will be able to learn from it. The meeting also will include a citizen who was involved in the creation of the City of Dunwoody to discuss why that community looked to a new municipality to solve some of the problems inherent in big county governance.

In addition, I’ll be happy to answer your questions about the status of the Brookhaven proposal and how it could progress in the future.


Downsizing the School Board for Better Governance

May 8, 2011

The 2011 session of the General Assembly is finished and in the books. Shortly before adjournment, we passed Senate Bill 79 (click for information), a bill that among other things will reduce the size of the DeKalb County Board of Education from nine to seven members. Governor Deal signed SB 79 into law a couple of weeks ago.

The provision of SB 79 that shrinks the DeKalb school board was taken from House Bill 63 (click for information), legislation that I authored earlier this year. It downsizes the school board by eliminating the two “super districts” that each cover half the county, leaving seven single-member districts of equal population.

In addition to yours truly, Senators Fran Millar (R-Dunwoody) and Emanuel Jones (D-Decatur) and Representatives Tom Taylor (R-Dunwoody) and Mary Margaret Oliver (D-Decatur) were instrumental in seeing to the passage of this important legislation. Despite the fact that just about every other DeKalb County legislator refused to see past the purely political arguments that were made against SB 79, this bipartisan group of five legislators worked together to take a major step forward for the DeKalb County School System.

In 2001, the DeKalb County Board of Education saw its membership increase from seven to nine seats. The current size of the school board is a major impediment to its operating at a high standard. This is why the passage of SB 79 was crucial.

Experts agree that smaller school boards provide higher quality governance than larger boards. The Commission for School Board Excellence, a group of leaders that wrote Georgia’s school board ethics law, has recommended that boards consist of no more than seven members. Georgia law already provides that school boards may have no more than seven members, but unfortunately school systems like DeKalb were grandfathered into this 2010 enactment.

DeKalb County, Clayton County, and the Atlanta Public Schools are the only districts in Metro Atlanta that do not meet this standard. Of the latter two districts, Clayton lost its accreditation in 2008 over alleged corruption among board members, and APS has been placed on probation by the accrediting agency known as Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS). SACS is in the process of reviewing school board governance in DeKalb County as well.

Mark Elgart, the president and CEO of SACS, recently told the Atlanta Journal-Constitution that “all of the problems in these systems are about board governance, power struggles, and unethical behavior – not teachers or lack of funding.”

Reducing the size of our school board can help eliminate these problems. “As you increase the number of actors that are on the board, you sometimes end up with an inability to act in conformance with anybody’s set of standards,” former State School Superintendent Brad Bryant, who hails from DeKalb County, told the AJC.

The Georgia School Boards Association (GSBA) regularly selects Georgia’s best school boards as “Distinguished Boards of Education” after a review of their performance and organizational structure. More than 90 percent of the boards chosen for 2008 through 2010 have only five members, according to GSBA’s website.

The Gwinnett County School System has the largest student enrollment in Georgia. It also has an award-winning board of education with only five members – two less than SB 79 will require for DeKalb County and four less than comprise DeKalb’s current board.

Of the four largest school districts in the state (Cobb, DeKalb, Fulton, and Gwinnett), DeKalb is the only one with a board of more than seven members.

My hope was that this necessary change could be made through local legislation, approved by a majority of the 19 representatives and 7 senators from DeKalb County working together to do what is right for our school system and our children.

In this regard, Representative Mary Margaret Oliver had proposed House Bill 22 (click for information), local legislation that could have addressed this issue from a local perspective. I supported HB 22 throughout this year’s legislative session and hoped for its passage, but watched with dismay as certain school board members and their friends in the legislature worked to ensure its defeat.

Within the past two years, our school system has seen the indictment of its superintendent and has spent millions of tax dollars in attorney’s fees for lawsuits against construction contractors.

Reducing the DeKalb school board to seven members is a necessary first step toward a better-run school system. I am pleased that we were able to overcome purely political obstacles in order to make it happen.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.